TENTH DELIVERY

THEORY OF RELATIVITY.- CRITICISM OF A NONSENSE  ANALYZED IN SEVEN FASCICLES

 

We continue with the series of deliveries, a summary of the book entitled: "Theory of relativity.- Critique of a nonsense analyzed in seven fascicles ", edited by AMAZON

 

                  THE FALLACY OF THE PRINCIPLE OF EQUIVALENCE

                                        WHAT MISTAKE DOES IT MAKE?

 

Confuse two different types of force

It confuses the container (the elevator) with the content (the masses)

Commits a fallacy of logical atinence ("ad hominen")

 

                  THE FALLACY OF THE PRINCIPLE OF EQUIVALENCE

   It confuses the type and application of the forces that intervene in the phenomenon

Contact Forces and Attraction Forces

         

                

                  THE FALLACY OF THE PRINCIPLE OF EQUIVALENCE

                                     A CONFUSION OF IDEAS

We must treat it as a similarity between experiments, and not as an equivalence of effects that have been caused by different causes (Different types of Forces).

The thought experiment begins by considering that an ATTRACTION force, such as the force of gravity (G), acts both on the CONTAINER and on the CONTENT (the Masses). Thus, physical phenomena related to MASS can occur.

The PULL force cannot be equated to a PULL force ON the CONTAINER. The TRACTION force acts only on the CONTAINER (on the elevator casing) NOT on the CONTENT, which are the MASSES inside it.

 

                        THE FALLACY OF THE PRINCIPLE OF EQUIVALENCE

 CRITICISM THE CONCEPTS USED IN YOUR MENTAL EXPERIMENT

To unmask this false comparison we say: IT IS NOT THE MASS "THAT" FALLS "IT IS THE SOIL THAT" RISES "

             

In the book that we take as a reference he tries to support the validity of his thought experiment with the following sentence:

“… Take good note that the possibility of this interpretation rests on the fundamental property that the gravitational field possesses of communicating the same acceleration to all bodies, or what amounts to the same thing, in the postulate of equality between inertial mass. and gravitational mass ... "

               THE FALLACY OF THE PRINCIPLE OF EQUIVALENCE

                      A FALLACY OF LOGICAL ATINENCE

With this tangle of concepts he tries to justify the unjustifiable.

We can propose a syllogism in which the premises are not related to the conclusion.

We too can commit a fallacy of the "ad hominen" type if we believe the validity of the thought experiment because of who is the person who proposes it.

 (Intellectual Property Registry: B-767-20)

 

End of our deliveries

We repeat what we already said in the First Delivery. In our book entitled: "Theory of Relativity.- Criticism of a nonsense analyzed in seven installments", edited by AMAZON, you will be able to read the following topics:

Fascicle 3.- Criticism of the conclusions of the essays that have tried to give the reason to the fallacy of time dilation.

Fascicle 4.- Where does it seem that the idea of presenting the First Premise that A. Einstein formulated in his book came from?

Fascicle 5.- An erroneous interpretation of the “enigmatic” Lorentz Factor.