SEVENTH DELIVERY

THEORY OF RELATIVITY.- CRITICISM OF A NONSENSE  ANALYZED IN SEVEN FASCICLES

 

We continue with the series of deliveries, a summary of the book entitled: "Theory of relativity.- Critique of a nonsense analyzed in seven fascicles ", edited by AMAZON

 

WHAT WRONG CONCLUSION CAN WE DRAW FROM THE OBSERVATION OF THE PREVIOUS FIGURE?

We have explained that the presence of the Earth deforms the Space that makes another Mass approach and "fall" on it

We ask ourselves: Can we "Materialize" Space and make BODIES navigate with it?

How should we interpret the case in which, for example, a Mass is so far from the Earth that the Force of Gravity does not act? Should we interpret that in this case the Space has been "unfolding" or "flattening"? ...

We think of the well-known idea that says: "Space is what remains of an empty room when its walls collapse." We must not give him material attributes

 

TWO MENTAL EXPERIMENTS THAT INVALIDATE THE IDEA OF SPACE DEFORMATION AS A CAUSE OF GRAVITY

We have designed two thought experiments in order to invalidate the idea that Space intervenes as a variable to be considered in the generation of Gravitational Forces. We will identify these approaches as:

1.- Mental experiment without the intervention of Space.

2.- Experiment with equal Spaces between the Acting Masses

We proceed to describe these thought experiments

We propose in our book to consider two thought experiments to invalidate the performance of "space" as one of the collaborators in the force of gravity.

  An experiment considers the trial without the intervention of space among the attractive masses

 

                   THE FALLACY OF SPACE DEFORMATION

           MENTAL EXPERIMENT WITHOUT THE INTERVENTION OF SPACE

The following figure represents the Earth and on its ground a mass attached to it. The question is: If there is no "Space" there is no force of attraction? ... Because it is an obvious demonstration and because of the reasoning that we expose in our book we must answer that there is a force of attraction.

Without worrying about the scale of the values ​​of its dimensions, we have drawn a large Mass that may correspond to the globe (MT) and, practically on top of it, another small mass, which could be, for example, a stone (mp)

                                   

                         THE FALLACY OF SPACE DEFORMATION

   MENTAL EXPERIMENT WITH EQUAL SPACE AMONG ACTUATING MASSES

We use a second thought experiment to criticize the space warping fallacy.

Two different masses at the same distance. It is interesting that we bear in mind that the ACCELERATION with which both Masses are subjected is the same, but they are subjected to different Attracting Forces (Fa).

                             

In the book "Theory of relativity.- A false theory" we expose the ideal example of two masses: A battle tank and a stone that fall from the same distance and we give the weights of each mass, and we calculate that their Forces of Attraction They are different. Therefore, it is not space that intervenes since we suppose them at the same distance from the Attractor Mass. It is clear that what we are analyzing are the Forces and not the acceleration they acquire. This is the same because its Mass intervenes in it.

 

In future installments these criticisms will continue

 (Intellectual Property Registry: B-767-20)