FIFTH DELIVERY

 

THEORY OF RELATIVITY.- CRITICISM OF A NONSENSE  ANALYZED IN SEVEN FASCICLES

 

We continue with the series of deliveries, a summary of the book entitled: "Theory of relativity.- Critique of a nonsense analyzed in seven fascicles ", edited by AMAZON

                       THE FALLACY OF DILATION OF THE MASS

                      THE ELONGATION OF THE MEASURING BAR

Paragraph 12 of the aforementioned book that we take as a reference is entitled: "THE BEHAVIOR OF MEASURING RULES AND MOBILE WATCHES"

It takes as a basis the thought experiment of the train car and, summarizing its content, tells us that: using a bar to measure lengths, this bar will be longer valued from the embankment, than it will be valued from the inside of the train car.

Another false interpretation. We clarify that instead of saying "IT WILL BE" longer, we must say: the longer "WE WILL SEE" if, standing still outside the wagon, we are observing it.

                            

         

              THE FALLACY OF THE RELATIVITY OF SIMULTANEITY

On a page of the aforementioned book by A. Einstein it is mentioned:

 “Two events, for example, two rays that are simultaneous with respect to the embankment, are NOT with respect to the train and vice versa. Each reference body (coordinate systems) has its special time. A

temporal location only makes sense when the body of reference to which it refers is indicated. "

 

The logic error is that: IT IS A SINGLE PHENOMENON

We must consider that: THE EVENT IS THE SIMULTANEOUS APPEARANCE OF TWO RAYS

           

                   

In this same installment of our book entitled: "Theory of relativity.- Critique of nonsense analyzed in seven installments" a criticism is made of the "mess" that appears in A. Einstein's book when trying to justify the constancy of speed of the light.

 

In future installments these criticisms will continue

 (Intellectual Property Registry: B-767-20)