THEORY OF RELATIVITY.- CRITICISM OF A NONSENSE ANALYZED IN SEVEN FASCICLES
We begin a series of installments that, each one of them, will be a summary of the book by the same author of this blog, entitled: "Theory of relativity.- Critique of a nonsense analyzed in seven installments" and edited by AMAZON.
PRESENTATION
We take
as reference the sentences written in the book of
Einstein
called “On the theory of special and general relativity.
If we go
to the source of information, they cannot accuse us of misrepresenting the
concepts.
The
content of this review includes several essays by the same author of this book,
validated and published in the scientific journal: "International Journal Fundamental
Physics Sciencies" "(IJFPS) and other essays published for more than
ten years in the online publication" monographies.com "
We
present this criticism, grouped in fascicles on the same subject. This approach
leads us to a breakdown of ideas on the same topic that allows us to separately
detect the fallacies in which the aforementioned theory concurs and that
without their breakdown seem to support each other to lead us to error.
We will
summarize the criticism of the following fallacies:
THE DILATION OF TIME
THE ERROR
OF WANTING TO INCLUDE SIMULTANEOUS PHENOMENA WITHIN RELATIVITY
THE DEFORMATION OF SPACE
THE
PRINCIPLE OF EQUIVALENCE
We expand
the justification of this criticism in our referred book. In it, and in other
fascicles, we also talk about the following topics: “The Lorentz Factor”;
"Criticism of the conclusions of the essays that have tried to give the
reason to the fallacy of the Dilation of Time"; “Where does the wrong idea
seem to come from, the premise that
A. Einstein formulates in his book? "
THE FALLACY OF TIME DILATION.-
THE PARADOX OF THE TWIN BROTHERS
• In this
study we will see where the error occurs when we want to admit as real the
science fiction story known as the "twin brothers"
• In it
it is said that in two brothers who are twins, one is an astronaut and
undertakes a journey in outer space at a speed close to that of light. Upon
returning to Earth, there is an age difference between the two brothers
THE FALLACY OF TIME
DILATION
FIRST PREMISE.- GENESIS OF NONSENSE
In the
statement that appears in the aforementioned Einstein book is where the
deformation of concepts that lead to fantasies that generate the fallacies of
the dilation of time and Mass is generated.
FIRST
PREMISE:
"The
time that a process takes in relation to the wagon cannot be equaled to the
duration of the same process judged from the reference body of the embankment
"
INTERPRETATION
OF THE FIRST PREMISE.- MENTAL EXPERIMENT OF THE TRAIN CAR
Some
books interpret the above statement by means of the
following
drawing:
A mirror is glued to the roof of the wagon. Inside the wagon there is a person who throws a ray of light towards the mirror, and waits for the reflection of it. Outside the wagon, fixed on the ground, there is an observer of this ray of light.
The
physical phenomenon of the reflection of light, the referred books identify it
with the PROCESS of which A. Einstein speaks in his First Premise. And from
this they deduce that the time of the process is different for the person who
is inside the car than the one who is outside.
THE FALLACY OF TIME
DILATION
ARGUMENTS
WE EXPOSE AGAINST THE "FIRST PREMISE"
1.-
Arguments that go directly against the First
Premise
1.- A contradiction of criteria.
2.-Logical reasoning about the invalidity
of the First
Premise
2.-
Arguments that go against the validity of the
Train car thought experiment.
3.- Consequences of accepting as valid the fallacy of
Time dilation.
1.- Time difference between mobile
watches
2.- The paradox of the Twin
Brothers.
4.- Wrong consequences that appear in some
books,
relying on the fallacy of the First
Premise
In future
installments we will give a summary of all these criticisms
(Intellectual
Property Registry: B-767-20)
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario