FOURTH DELIVERY

THEORY OF RELATIVITY.- CRITICISM OF A NONSENSE  ANALYZED IN SEVEN FASCICLES

We continue with the series of deliveries, a summary of the book entitled: "Theory of relativity.- Critique of a nonsense analyzed in seven fascicles", edited by AMAZON

                               THE FALLACY OF TIME DILATION

3.- CONSEQUENCES OF ADMITTING TIME DILATION AS VALID

    3.2.- THE PARADOX OF THE TWIN BROTHERS

We can admit that the TIME OF THE VISION OF OBSERVATION is lengthened, but the OWN TIME of the oscillation of the clock, the Tick-Tock, will be the same for the two Twin Brothers.

                         THE FALLACY OF TIME DILATION

4.- WRONG CONSEQUENCES THAT APPEAR IN SOME BOOKS, BASED ON THE FALLACY OF THE FIRST PREMISE

The aforementioned books that present the Mind Experiment of the wagon train, calculate the relationship between (td) and (tp) and find the relationship:

Where (c) is the value of the speed of light and (v) the speed of a movable body. And since the denominator of the second member of the equality is less than one, hence they make the mistake of saying that: time(td), observed from outside the wagon, is greater than Time Own (tp) of the phenomenon investigated.

We cannot attribute these results to the same phenomenon and equate both results. If we do, an error of interpretation is made

 

                          THE FALLACY OF TIME DILATION

                DESCRIPTION OF ERRORS IN THE FIRST PREMISE

Of interpretation: td is equal to (L) T_d  (TD=(L)T_d)   instead of considering that it is a value obtained in two different experiments

CONFUSE THE VISION OF THE PHENOMENON WITH THE OWN PHENOMENON AN ERROR OF LOGIC.- A CONTRADICTION IN THE THEORY

In future installments these criticisms will continue

(Intellectual Property Registry: B-767-20)