THEORY OF RELATIVITY - DECEPTIVE APPROACHES - THIRD DELIVERY

(Intellectual Property Registry: B-221-21)

We continue with the topic: 2.4.- THE FALLACY OF THE DEFORMATION OF SPACE

WHAT INFORMATION DOES NEWTON'S LAW PROVIDE US?

The aforementioned Newton's law informs us of the way of valuing and the way of acting of the Masses that intervene with respect to the Force of Attraction (Fa) that appears between them. Newton informs us that a force field appears between the Masses, but he does not inform us of why it is generated. This is where the "mental fantasies" appear to try to explain what is unknown.

However, this law gives us arguments to refute the fantasy of the deformation of space.

 

ANALYSIS OF THE FACTORS INTERVENING IN THE PHENOMENON

To try that in our investigation we do not go against common sense, we suggest using an analysis carrying out the following three steps:

1.- A Physical Phenomenon is produced between two known AUTHORS who intervene in the phenomenon. We call them Masses: (M1) and (M2)

2.- We define a platform outside the variables of the phenomenon. We identify it as: SPACE.

3.- There must be a LINK between the two authors, the Masses, which makes them interact with each other. This NEXO is the variable that we do not know and that we have our doubts to identify it.

Maybe it's the Neutrinos moving around

 sidereal space and crossing all the masses establish the nexus between two Masses?... We leave to the consideration, analysis, criticism and investigation of the experts in Atomic Physics.

 

WHAT HAS THE PREVIOUS ANALYSIS USED US FOR?

These three points help us define the following:

We separate the "actors" that intervene in the physical phenomenon, from the support or platform in which it is carried out.

Using the metaphor we will say that:

The stage in which the function takes place is SPACE. The actors are the MASSES. Their dialogue between them is their LINK.

 

WHAT WRONG CONCLUSION CAN WE DRAW FROM THE OBSERVATION OF FIGURE 1?

We have explained that the presence of the Earth deforms the Space that makes another Mass approach and "fall" on it

We ask ourselves: Can we “Materialize” Space and make BODIES navigate with it?

How should we interpret the case in which, for example, a Mass is so far from the Earth that the Force of Gravity does not act? Should we interpret that in this case the Space has been "unfolding" or "flattening"?...

We think of the well-known idea that says: “Space is what remains of an empty room when its walls collapse”. We should not give him material attributes

 

TWO THOUGHT EXPERIMENTS THAT INVALIDATE THE IDEA OF SPACE WARPING AS A CAUSE OF GRAVITY

We have designed two mental experiments in order to invalidate the idea that Space intervenes as a variable to consider in the generation of Gravitational Forces. We will identify these approaches as:

1.- Mental experiment without the intervention of Space.

2.- Experiment with equal Spaces between the acting Masses

We proceed to describe these thought experiments

 

1.- MENTAL EXPERIMENT WITHOUT THE INTERVENTION OF SPACE

Let us remember that we separate as two different entities, the Space and the Masses that occupy this Space.

If in the approach of the appearance of attractive forces (Fa) between two Masses, we omit the intervention of SPACE, we wonder if these forces will really appear.

If with the aforementioned omission we can observe that those forces continue to exist, this will allow us to affirm that the concept of SPACE and its DEFORMATION are not causative agents of the physical phenomenon that we are dealing with.

APPROACH TO THOUGHT EXPERIMENT No. 1

Suppose two MASSES located in outer space, touching each other, or very close to each other, in which we can appreciate that there is practically NO “Space” between them. Can we say for this that there is no force of attraction between them? them because there is no “Space”?

REPRESENTATION OF THE EXPERIMENT

Without worrying about the scale of the values ​​of its dimensions, we have drawn a large Mass that can correspond to the globe (MT) and, practically on top of it, another small mass, which could be, for example, a stone (mp) Reality confirms that we cannot say that since there is no "space" between them that can be deformed, there is no gravity                             

                                  

A POSSIBLE DOUBT: Doubt may arise when asking ourselves if, since there is no Space, how do the MASSES interact? In a previous paragraph, when talking about the possible existence of subatomic particles, we have commented that it seems that what produces this nexus is present both in Space (support of the Physical Phenomenon that we are considering) and inside the acting Masses themselves. . We repeat what we have already said: perhaps the exchange of the subatomic particles corresponding to each of the two Masses is involved here? We leave this investigation for the experts on these topics.

2.- MENTAL EXPERIMENT WITH EQUAL SPACES BETWEEN THE ACTING MASSES

 EXPERIMENT APPROACH

In this thought experiment we consider two masses of different sizes (m1) and (m2) that are at the same distance (d) from a third Mass that attracts them. That is, we will assume

(d1) = (d2) The figure tries to represent this situation. We will suppose, for example, that the big ball is the Earth. We have represented its Mass by (MT).

 

                      

AN OBSERVATION

Do not confuse concepts:

It is interesting that we take into account that the ACCELERATION with which both Masses are subjected is the same, but they are subjected to different Forces of Attraction (Fa). We must consider that what we are investigating is the concept "FORCE" and not the concept "ACCELERATION". We investigate the cause. Not the effects. For this reason it is interesting to take into account this conclusion and that it could divert us from our objective

 

DIFFERENT FORCES OF ATTRACTION.

If we take as an example two very different masses, such as: a stone with a mass equal to: (mp) = 1Kgm. and a battle tank with a mass equal to (mc) = 62.5 x 103 Kgs. that fall from the same height towards the surface of the Earth, we will obtain that the Forces of Attraction to which they have been subjected are respectively equal to:

                      (Fc) = 61,464x 104 Kgs

                     (Fp) = 9,834 kg.

The conclusion is that two masses (m1) and (m2) at the same distance from the attracting mass (MT) are subjected to different Forces of Attraction (Fa). So we have to deduce that the notion of the intervention of SPACE in the referred Force of Attraction "has vanished". We are left with the idea that the main ACTORS are the MASSES. NOT THE SPACE.

(NOTE: In the book by the same author of this essay, entitled: "Theory of Relativity. -A false theory" the data and the calculation process are given to reach the referred results)

ACQUIRED ACCELERATION IS THE SAME

We can verify that the two mentioned different forces generate equal accelerations. If we divide each Force obtained by its corresponding Mass, identical values ​​will be obtained. That is to say:

                    (Ac) = (61.464 x 104 )/62.5x103 = 9.834 m/sec²   

                    (Ap) = 9,834/1 = 9,834 meters/sec²   

These results serve to remind us of what we said before: “Do not confuse concepts”

A PROBABLE DOUBT?

Perhaps in this confusion that the well-known Physicist subjects us to, with the idea that space bends, we wonder if we should consider the interior of the two spheres as a "space". absurd idea. We must be clear about the distinction between: SPACE and BODIES. The attracting Mass must be considered as a whole. As a BODY whose center of gravity is precisely in the center of this BODY

A FINAL DOUBT

We summarize our last doubt in the question: can we associate the Gravitational Matter that Einstein speaks of with Dark Matter?

(END OF DELIVERIES)