(Intellectual Property Registry: B-221-21)
FIRST DELIVERY
PRESENTATION
Recently we read in different writings of a scientific
nature, topics that seem written only to praise the Theory of Relativity. With this
essay we criticize this theory, trying with our arguments to restore common
sense in the interpretation of relative movements.
Some of these
arguments the reader will be able to see them written in our “little book”
entitled: “Theory of relativity. - Criticizes de a nonsense analyzed in seven
installments ”. We define our treatise as a "little book" since it
contains only slightly more than fifty pages, but we believe that it is not
necessary to extend much when in a few words an absurdity can be highlighted.
The first topic that
we will address will be: "The (GPS) and mobile watches". The writings
that speak of this subject put it as experimental evidence, pretending to
defend the Theory of Special Relativity. They accept the fallacy of time
dilation. In our "little book", in fascicle three, entitled:
"Criticize the conclusions of the essays that have tried to prove the
fallacy of time dilation", we have already included this topic. But what
we now intend is to denounce all the wrong or false information aimed at
accepting the fallacies of the aforementioned theory.
We will also criticize the use of the Theory of General
Relativity. Recently, some popular science fascicles have appeared on “dark
matter” and “black holes”, which admit the fallacy of the “deformation of
space”.
This Theory, supported by the fallacy of the Equivalence
Principle, leads us to admit that the force that a Mass (M) attracts another
mass (m), is interpreted as a consequence of a deformation of the space between
them. We will see that a fallacy that has its origin in another fallacy is
admitted.
(We will make THREE
DELIVERIES of the aforementioned topics.)
STUDY DIVISION
For the reader's orientation, we give the following
guideline for the development of the study:
1.-. The fallacy of Special Relativity. (GPS) and mobile
watches
2.- The fallacy of General Relativity:
2.1.-
Transcription of some comments that appeared in fascicles
of
scientific popularization.
2.2.- Genesis of
nonsense. - Inertial mass and gravitational mass
2.3.- Mental
experiment of the "elevator". The fallacy of the Principle of
Equivalence
2.4.- the fallacy
of the · deformation of space.
1.- THE FALLACY OF SPECIAL RELATIVITY.- A CONFUSION WHEN
EXPLAINING (GPS) AND MOBILE WATCHES.
We deal with this issue, already exposed in our "little
book", in the third fascicle entitled: "Criticize the conclusions of
the essays that have tried to prove the fallacy of time dilation". The
reason for inserting it in the present study is because we have repeatedly read
some writings in which they claim to support the aforementioned theory,
justifying it through the use of mobile clocks.
When explaining how to act (GPS) and the mobile clocks that
they have incorporated, the writings that deal with the subject make the
mistake of associating them with the Theory of Relativity as proposed by
Einstein. In this way, they intend to validate the fallacy of time dilation.
We transcribe a part of one of the aforementioned writings:
“GPS receivers determine their position by triangulating
from the time signals they receive from various satellites.
Correct synchronization of these clocks with the clocks on
the earth's surface is essential for this correct positioning. These satellites
have very precise atomic clocks, which in principle do not significantly slow
or advance but relativity plays a trick on them.
Because of these effects predicted by Einstein's theory, it
turns out that the satellites' clocks are ahead of those on the ground.
After launching the first satellite in 1977 and 20 orbits,
the satellite's clock was observed to be 442.5 parts of 1012 faster than an
identical one on the earth's surface that are 38,000 nanoseconds ahead. This is
the advance that clocks in orbit suffer (or the delay that clocks suffer on the
earth's surface) and it must be corrected in the satellites for a correct
positioning "
(We write the following link in case the reader wants to
expand what is said in that writing: http://www.relatividad.org/bhole/gps.htm)
Actually, it is a
question of relative movements, but, from here to going to stop as time
stretches, it is a logical aberration. We comment on this fallacy.
His misinterpretation comes from the statement we find in
Einstein's book, entitled: "On the theory of special and general
relativity." Speaking of a train car inside which a process is carried
out, in this statement he says:
“The time that a process takes in relation to the wagon
cannot be equaled to the duration of the same process judged from the reference
body of the embankment"
In our "little book" entitled: "Theory of
relativity.- Criticism of a nonsense", we baptized such an affirmation as
the GENESIS OF DISPARATE. In it we set out more than three reasons to justify
that this statement cannot be accepted as an axiom. To see this nonsense more
clearly, we represent the train car, which appears in some treatises on the
subject, and which we also give in the aforementioned "booklet", in
the following figure:
In the thought experiment of the train car, which is
traveling at a certain constant speed (v) and rectilinear. Inside there is a
phenomenon of reflection of a ray of light in the mirror (back and forth) that
is glued to the ceiling. This phenomenon has an Own Time (tp), and this is
unique. It is inherent in this process. The one observed from outside the wagon
does not justify that this (tp) changes in value.
In the relative movement of an object or body, with respect
to a fixed observer, the transformation of the Proper Time (tp) of the object
or process is not observed, but the value of the vision of the path of the body
or process is observed.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgSifXyjLrUuOzWejwj9P595tuXtUuRbWcVLi_NjkaLQdDlTxgPCCLuoeUeZNIuyvywqpRcm3j43k0XpQtqlNS82-zyXuTkOzX4IrqMakMiq8h2eh_sH7BSfQrCVg9BkFkw6FBJ1DEghN8/)
In the thought experiment of the train car, which is
traveling at a certain constant speed (v) and rectilinear. Inside there is a
phenomenon of reflection of a ray of light in the mirror (back and forth) that
is glued to the ceiling. This phenomenon has an Own Time (tp), and this is
unique. It is inherent in this process. The one observed from outside the wagon
does not justify that this (tp) changes in value.
In the relative movement of an object or body, with respect
to a fixed observer, the transformation of the Proper Time (tp) of the object
or process is not observed, but the value of the vision of the path of the body
or process is observed.
Figure 2
This figure
represents the observer who is fixed on the ground, and who receives
information about the amplitude of the phenomenon, through the arrival of
electromagnetic waves. The perception and measurement by this observer, of the
referred phenomenon, will be distorted by including in them the movement of the
wagon.
Another
theme is represented on the left side of the figure. It really means the (tp)
of the process. It is the one observed by the person who goes inside the car
and throws the beam. It is as if the wagon is stopped..
We can
equate the ticking of a pendulum clock to the process of the reflection of the
ray of light, and assimilate it to the passage of time. The process monopolizes
the different positions through which it runs until it reaches the same
starting point.
Figura 3
There would be a difference between what the clock of the
person who is fixed on the ground would mark and the pendulum mobile clock.
Your Own Time (tp).
(NOTE: We have simplified taking into account the variables
that may intervene in the phenomenon, in order to make it as intuitive as
possible. Thus, we have associated it with the train car. But, in reality, if
we place the pendulum clock in space sidereal, this example would be of little
use to us if we did not intervene, somewhere, a gravitational force that allows
the law of the pendulum to be fulfilled) In the absence of gravity we can think
of mechanical or atomic clocks
Figure 4
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiNmHGzxyNSeCKxADaGiHbE6QTlUAYSZko5VeEjuliupo6dh4fZ3VgY1P75NyXJQeUg6BMUEZBnjhfyi0rlzC_fK_npwPLAsYDDaivQi407__ZchEyVuF4ZXMv9LQxXBgMcFgRbzq6iCuo/)
In the Figure we have kept the idea of the train car, with
the wheels on the ground, although in reality we must place the experiment in
outer space.
Small time lags will be observed due to information time.
That is, the time it takes for the electromagnetic waves to arrive and that
depends on the amplitude of the Displacement Time (td) of the mobile clock. We
can say: NOTHING OF DILATION OF TIME. Yes to RERLATIVE MOVEMENTS. NO TO
THEOERIES OF RELATIVITY.
2.- THE FALLACY OF GENERAL RELATIVITY
Before going into developing the topics of: the fallacy of
the Equivalence Principle and the fallacy of the "deformation of
space", we transcribe some manifestations that appear in some fascicles
that speak of "dark matter" and "black holes" and that In
the absence of finding a rational statement, they rely on the Theory of General
Relativity. We will take advantage of this transcript to make a critique of its
concepts. In this review, for the text that we will transcribe of the
aforementioned statements, we will write them using italics, enclosing the text
in quotation marks.
2.1.- TRANSCRIPTION OF THE TEXT OF SOME FASCICLES OF
SCIENTIFIC DISCLOSURE
We initiate the aforementioned transcript and our comments.
IT SAYS IN THE MENTIONED COLLECTION:
“The principle of special relativity establishes that the
speed of light is constant in any reference frame, that is, it does not depend
on the speed of the observer. This has radical consequences. Space and time
must be treated together, so that we will no longer speak of space and time,
but of a single entity known as space-time. "
OUR COMMENT:
We believe that the use of the space-time entity is not
required precisely by the constancy of the speed of light. It is obvious that
when we observe the RELATIVE physical phenomena, which occur in outer space,
and that we translate them as EVENTS or EVENTS, we must determine the situation
in which they occur, the space implies, and the time in which it occurs. That
is, we define not only the POSITION but also what we will define as the
SITUATION. This concept encompasses both entities.
(See the essay by the
same author of this study, entitled: "Theory of relativity. - Mathematical
interpretation of the Lorentz Factor")
IT SAYS IN THE MENTIONED COLLECTION:
“In addition, both the time elapsed between two events and
the length of an object in the direction of the observer, they depend on the
speed of the observer. Thus, a clock moving at a speed close to that of light
with respect to a reference frame that we consider at rest will be delayed with
respect to it, that is, the Time measured by the moving clock would
progressively slow down with with respect to the system at rest. These effects
of time dilation and length contraction are only important at speeds close to
that of light. In other words, they have no significant effects on our ordinary
life. "
OUR COMMENT:
We have already talked about this topic before. Also in our
“little book” we talk about the fallacy of the deformation of the mass.
IT SAYS IN THE MENTIONED COLLECTION:
“If special relativity disrupted the idea of absolute
time, general relativity for its part changed our notions about gravitation. In
classical Newtonian physics, gravitation consisted of the attraction between
bodies that have mass according to the law of universal gravitation. In
relativistic physics, gravitation is the effect of the deformation or curvature
of space-time produced by the mass of objects, a black hole, for example,
curves space-time. "
OUR COMMENT:
In our essay we will dedicate a booklet to criticize the
fallacy of the “deformation of space”. It seems important to us to unlink black
holes with the intervention of this fallacy.
IT SAYS IN THE MENTIONED COLLECTION:
"General
Relativity is a theory that describes the way in which the same phenomenon is
viewed by different observers, regardless of their position, speed or
acceleration"
OUR COMMENT:
See the fallacies of "time dilation" (Special
Theory) and that of the "Equivalence Principle" (General Theory)
discussed in our "little book", in the first issue: "LA GENESIS
DEL DISPARATE". You can also find this topic, among others edited, in our
blog, entering in Google: teoriadelarelatividad.com
IT SAYS IN THE MENTIONED COLLECTION:
“… In this sense it is an extension of Special
Relativity, formulated by Einstein in 1905 and which referred only to observers
with constant speed. The notions of space and time are not as our intuition
seems to tell us, that is, inert and immutable magnitudes, space-time, as a
whole can be stretched, shrunk, bent and twisted.”
OUR COMMENT:
We will see that the "thought experiment" that
Einstein claims to rely on to justify the Equivalence Principle and with it to
validate the Theory of General Relativity is a fallacy.
IT SAYS IN THE MENTIONED COLLECTION:
“… But, in
addition, general relativity is a theory of gravitation. The important point is
that, according to her, is that space is curved due to the presence of mass and
energy. The important point is that, according to her, spacetime curves due to
the presence of mass and energy. According to general relativity in the
vicinity of a large mass, spacetime curves. An object left to itself, when
approaching this great mass, enters a zone of curved space-time and its
trajectory is altered, accelerating "
OUR COMMENT:
The ignorance of the cause of the existence of the force of
gravity should not be replaced by the absurdity that space is deformed.
Later, we will transcribe a fascicle of the "little
book": "Theory of relativity.- Criticism of a nonsense" to
denounce this fallacy.
IT SAYS IN THE MENTIONED COLLECTION:
“Since stars
describe orbits of gigantic radius the relativistic effects are absolutely
negligible. For them the predictions of Newton and Einstein are totally
equivalent.
Well, maybe Einstein's predictions are not perfect
either, and at these giant distances the real gravitational force is different
from that distanced by his equations, causing an effect that seems to be
produced by dark matter; just as the anomalies of Mercury's orbit seemed the
effect of a mysterious, and ultimately nonexistent, planet Vulcan”
OUR COMMENT:
For the first time, our editor seems to be beginning to
doubt the validity of the aforementioned theory and agrees with Newton.
In our opinion, he is getting closer to the phenomenon of
the force of gravity by using the concept of dark matter than by using the
fallacy of the deformation of space. (In the issue that we will expose on this
topic, we will see that when we published it we already pointed out such a
possibility)
IT IS SAID IN THE MENTIONED COLLECTION:
“… Let's remember,
the presence of matter and energy determines the way in which space-time bends.
It is certainly a very difficult concept to imagine, but perfectly possible to
formulate mathematically.
OUR COMMENT:
Being able to mathematically formulate an absurdity does not
validate it as true.
IT SAYS IN THE MENTIONED COLLECTION:
"And what do
the equations of relativity say about the dynamics of the universe? Einstein
himself verified that these did not admit a solution in which the universe was
static. The equations indicated that the universe must necessarily go through a
phase of expansión
OUR COMMENT:
Here they try to sneak in the fallacy of the deformation of
space. We believe that it is the objects (stars, galaxies ...) that are
separating. It is not that the space between them is dilated.
IT SAYS IN THE MENTIONED COLLECTION:
“Other scientists
predicted in the last century, the phenomenon of the expansion of the universe
and even came to the concept of Big Bang, the moment of the great explosion
that gave rise to the subsequent expansion. It is overwhelming to think that
such formidable results can be reached on nothing less than the origin of the
universe, reasoning on some mathematical equations that fit on a line "
OUR COMMENT:
As a curiosity, you can read our research work published on
our blog and also in the scientific journal: "International Journal of
Fundamental Phisycs Sciences", entitled: "The expression E = mc ^ 2
shows that in ancient times there was a great explosion." The reader will
observe that the aid of the Theory of Relativity is not cited at all,
IT SAYS IN THE MENTIONED COLLECTION:
“Let us remember
that the theory of general relativity predicts that the universe must
necessarily go through a phase of expansion. As actually observed in reality.
Let's delve a bit into the characteristics of this expansion. What you have to
imagine is that it is space itself that is stretched equally in all directions,
so that the galaxies "inserted" in it progressively separate. It is
what is called a homogeneous and isotropic expansion "
OUR COMMENT:
Once again they try to validate nonsense.
IT SAYS IN THE MENTIONED COLLECTION:
"Naturally,
if the universe is accelerating its expansion," something is wrong
"in the initial theoretical reasoning, based on the equations of general
relativity, which predicted that the expansion should slow down. Are Einstein's
equations wrong? "
OUR COMMENT:
It seems that, in the end, our commentator begins to doubt
the fallacies of the dilation of time and the deformation of space.
(WILL CONTINUE IN A NEXT DELIVERY)